General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Show
Pipelines / CUDA cores19216Core clock speed625 MHz350 MHzBoost clock speedno data1350 MHzNumber of transistors1,170 million1,200 millionManufacturing process technology40 nm22 nmPower consumption (TDP)62 WattunknownTexture fill rate20.0020.80Floating-point performance480.0 gflops33.6 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on Quadro 2000 and HD Graphics 4000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16Length178 mmno dataWidth1-slotno dataSupplementary power connectorsNoneno data MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5System SharedMaximum RAM amount1 GBSystem SharedMemory bus width128 Bit64/128 BitMemory clock speed2600 MHzSystem SharedMemory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno dataShared memoryno data+ Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (11_0)Shader Model5.15.0OpenGL4.64.0OpenCL1.11.2VulkanN/A1.1.80CUDA2.1no data Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. Quadro 2000 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 109% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% Quadro 2000 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 108% in Passmark. Mining hashratesCryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro 2000 and HD Graphics 4000. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 31 Mh/s no data Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: 900p24−27 12 Full HD21−24 11 Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 2.44 1.17 Recency 24 December 2010 23 March 2011 Memory bus width 128 64 Pipelines / CUDA cores 192 16 Chip lithography 40 nm 22 nm The Quadro 2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4000 in performance tests. Be aware that Quadro 2000 is a workstation card while HD Graphics 4000 is a notebook one. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. Quadro 2000 HD Graphics 4000 Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA Quadro 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate Intel HD Graphics 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |