Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Intel HD Graphics 520 on one side and Intel HD Graphics 4400 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, with 24 execution units, it has 192 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.1 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, with 20 execution units, it includes 160 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.2 GHz, its lithography is 22 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card Intel HD Graphics 520 Intel HD Graphics 4400 Market (main) Laptop Desktop Release date Q3 2015 Q3 2013 GPU name Skylake GT2 Haswell GT2 Architecture Generation 9.0 Generation 7.5 Generation Skylake Mobile Haswell Lithography 14 nm 22 nm Transistors 1,900,000,000 1,300,000,000 Bus interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 1.0 x16 GPU base clock 300 MHz 350 MHz GPU boost clock 1,050 MHz 1,150 MHz TDP 15 W 20 W Execution units 24 20 Shading units 192 160 TMUs 24 20 ROPs 3 2 Pixel fillrate 3.2 GP/s 2.3 GP/s Texture fillrate 25.2 GT/s 23.0 GT/s Performance FP32 (float) 403.2 GFLOPS 368 GFLOPS Performance FP64 (double) 100.8 GFLOPS 92 GFLOPS Amazon

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS Intel HD Graphics 520

The difference is 10%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.

Processors with the graphics card Intel HD Graphics 520:

Intel Core i3-6006UIntel Core i3-6100UIntel Core i5-6200UIntel Core i5-6300UIntel Core i7-6500UIntel Core i7-6600U

Processors with the graphics card Intel HD Graphics 4400:

Intel Core i3-4130Intel Core i3-4130TIntel Core i3-4150Intel Core i3-4150TIntel Core i3-4160Intel Core i3-4160TIntel Core i3-4170Intel Core i3-4170T

Equivalence:

Intel HD Graphics 520 Nvidia EquivalentIntel HD Graphics 520 AMD EquivalentIntel HD Graphics 4400 Nvidia EquivalentIntel HD Graphics 4400 AMD Equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag

ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.