Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Pentium G3220 on one side and the Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.0GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 2 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page. Specification comparison:Processor Intel Pentium G3220 Intel Core 2 Duo E7500Market (main)Desktop DesktopISAx86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)MicroarchitectureHaswell PenrynCore nameHaswell-DT Wolfdale-3MFamilyPentium 3000 Core 2 Duo 7000Part number(s), S-Spec BX80646G3220, BXC80646G3220, CM8064601482519, CM8064601562017, QDN2, QF54, SR1CG, SR1RK BX80571E7500, BXC80571E7500, AT80571PH0773M, AT80571PH0773ML, SLB9Z Release dateQ3 2013 Q1 2009Lithography22 nm 45 nmTransistors1,400,000,000 228,000,000Cores2 2Threads2 2Base frequency3.0 GHz 2.93 GHzTurbo frequency- -High performance cores 2 Cores 2 Threads @ 3.0 GHz - Cache memory3 MB 3 MBMax memory capacity32 GB 8 GBMemory types DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 DDR2-800 Max PCIe lanes16 16TDP53 W 65 WSuggested PSU600W ATX Power Supply  Execute Disable Bit - Max display resolution 1920 x 1080@60Hz (HDMI), 2560 x 1600@60Hz (DP), 2560 x 1600@60Hz (eDP), 1920 x 1200@60Hz (VGA) - CPU-Z single thread315 246CPU-Z multi thread631 471Cinebench R15 single thread116 97Cinebench R15 multi-thread221 152PassMark single thread1,695 1,196PassMark CPU Mark1,852 1,092(Windows) Geekbench 4 single core2,987 1,746(Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core4,957 2,882(SGEMM) GFLOPS Performance36.72 GFLOPS 28.4 GFLOPS(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio94 pts / W 44 pts / WAmazon Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. Suggested PSU: We assume that we have an ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc. Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability. We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Pentium G3220 is greater, that the PDT of Intel Pentium G3220 is lower. The Intel Pentium G3220 was designed earlier. Performance comparison with the benchmarks:Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench. CPU-Z - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score Intel Pentium G3220 In single core, the difference is 28%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 34%. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results. CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread. Cinebench R15 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score Intel Pentium G3220 In single core, the difference is 20%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 45%. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results. Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points. PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread Intel Pentium G3220 In single core, the difference is 42%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 70%. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results. PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity. With Windows: Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows Intel Pentium G3220 In single core, the difference is 71%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 72%. With Linux: Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Linux Intel Pentium G3220 In single core, the difference is 69%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 70%. With Mac OS X: Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Mac OS X Intel Pentium G3220 In single core, the difference is 69%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 69%. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results. Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software. |
