‘Manual testing is dead!’ Show The buzz has divided the world of software testing in two parts. Some make predictions about a future where all tests are automated; others think that manual testing is still the best option. So, who is right? Manual vs. automated testingAutomating all test cases sounds like a perfect solution – now you can fire manual testers and test the application with a single click. Not true. Applications are written for us, human beings, and we often interact with software in unique ways. Therefore, the most important bugs are found when interacting and observing the application like real users do: we call this exploratory testing and this is something automation cannot do for you. Running the same test over and over won’t show if something else has changed in the application, and it will miss most of the usability bugs. To summarize, automation is useless where human thinking and judgement are needed. It cannot replace manual testers until AI reaches its pinnacle where it can replace programmers, doctors, and managers. Nevertheless, in recent years, technologies have developed rapidly and market demands have raised new challenges for testers. As applications become more complex, we need to ensure they work on large sets of configurations and devices. Automation can be a great support by handling repetitive and technical aspects like regression, performance, and load tests. As for the question in the epigraph, I think what should die is the separation of testing as “manual” and “automated”. Testing is only manual, but we can, and we should, use automation to be more productive whenever relevant. This pushes testers to evolve into specialists with manual testing skills to find the important bugs and also with programming skills to automate repetitive tests. In a given application, you may decide to automate some scenarios on the unit test level, some on the API level, some on the UI level, and manually test other scenarios. To define this strategy in the most optimal way, testers should have a deep understanding of the application, its domain, and the technologies involved. In a nutshell, testers should have skills in both manual and automated testing and the insight to combine them wisely. Matching these demands is a challenge for many testers, as they may have little or no technical background. This should not be a barrier though because with the right approach, learning can be turned into an engaging and exciting process. So, let’s first have a look at coding skills in terms of the benefits it can bring to a tester. You Might Also Like: Creating a Holistic Strategy for Software Quality Testing Benefits of coding skills in software testingA common misunderstanding is that manual testing is not technical and that you need to learn coding only for automation purposes. In fact, having a basic understanding of programming can substantially benefit the manual testing process alone. When we learn to program, we learn about the elements and structure of software. We learn how data is represented inside the computer, and how bits can be interpreted and misinterpreted. We learn about flow control, decision points, looping, and how mistakes can be made. Even if we never see the source code, when we learn how programs work, we also learn how they might not work. Essentially, I see coding skills as a technical skill that enhances manual testing and builds a foundation for automated testing, taking the tester to a new level in their profession. There are 7 key ways that learning to code, and more specifically, learning Python (see below), will improve your software testing. They can be divided into two categories: the benefits of understanding code and the benefits of writing code.
Let’s see how understanding programming concepts (points 1-5) and knowing how to write code (points 6-7) can make you a better software tester:
Here are a few examples:
All of these tasks can be automated via scripts and can support testers in finding issues which otherwise would be difficult to find. Now that we understand the benefits of coding skills, let’s see which programming language we should learn. You Might Also Like: Test Strategies for HIPAA Compliance Which programming language is best for testing?Java, JavaScript, C#, Ruby, Python, C++ – these are all great technologies, but is there one that is best for test scripting and automation? Generally, all the above-mentioned programming languages would do the job, so if you already know one, just use it. But given that often testers are not technically strong, a deciding factor may be how easy the language is to pick up. Python has an advantage here. According to recent research, Python is considered the easiest language to learn, and many colleges in the US teach programming with Python. In addition to this, there are also other factors that make Python a great fit for testers:
Given that testers need a programming language that is easy to learn, fits a wide range of tasks, is supported by Selenium WebDriver, and is convenient for scripting, Python is a great choice for a tester to learn. How to learn PythonSo, after you have selected Python as the programming language, how do you learn it? Here is a simple roadmap to help you get started:
Learning how to program is an ongoing process. You can always be improving your skills, so keep going until you reach the desired level of competence. Here is a list of great Python resources freely available on the net to help you continue your learning:
To sum things upBeing an intellectual process of questioning, interacting, and evaluating software, manual testing will be needed as long as software is written by human beings. However, there are aspects of software testing that can greatly benefit from automation and can free up testers’ time for more creative testing tasks. Thus, to be highly productive and provide great value, testers should develop coding skills to take advantage of automation. As an easy-to-learn scripting language, Python is a great choice for testers. Learning to program in Python can be fun if you pick up an exciting idea that can translate into a useful piece of software, and there are a number of great resources freely available in the web to support you in your learning. Can we use Python in software testing?Given that testers need a programming language that is easy to learn, fits a wide range of tasks, is supported by Selenium WebDriver, and is convenient for scripting, Python is a great choice for a tester to learn.
How is Python used in automation testing?Python Test Automation Framework
As python test automation frameworks are built using python language, it brings together the modules and packages, which allows us to develop applications quickly. It enables testers to create clear test cases easily using a keyword-driven-test approach.
Is Python good for QA testing?Still, Python has a number of benefits that make it an optimal solution. Python is easy to learn. A QA engineer has to focus on software testing services, and learning new things shouldn't become an obstacle. The simple syntax makes Python the best programming language to learn from scratch.
|