When the frequency of a behavior is decreased by learning this what is it called?

If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Instrumental conditioning; Negative punishment; Negative reinforcement; Positive punishment; Positive reinforcement

Definition

In behavioral learning theory, operant conditioning is defined as a learning process in which the likelihood of a specific voluntary behavior is strengthened (increases in frequency) or weakened (decreases in frequency) in response to consequences (reinforcement or punishment, respectively), occurring after the behavior is exhibited.

Introduction

Operant conditioning is a learning process appearing in behavioral learning theory. According to the theory, the likelihood of a specific voluntary behavior is strengthened (increases in frequency) or weakened (decreases in frequency) in response to the consequences (reinforcement or punishment, respectively) that follow the behavior. Whereas classical conditioning is used to re-train reflect behaviors (e.g., crying when we feel afraid, salivating when we smell food) so that they appear under new conditions...

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

When the frequency of a behavior is decreased by learning this what is it called?

References

  • Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2009). Applied behavior analysis for teachers. Upper Sadle River: Pearson/Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2002). Eminent psychologists of the 20th century. Monitor on Psychology, 33(7), 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azrin, N. H., Hutchinson, R. R., & Hake, D. F. (1966). Extinction-induced aggression. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 191–204.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. A., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behaviour analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, E. J., Martens, B. K., Skinner, C. H., & Noell, G. H. (2009). Contributions of applied behavior analysis. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of school psychology (4th ed., pp. 84–106). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donahoe, J. W. (2003). Selectionism. In K. A. Lattal & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory and philosophy (pp. 103–128). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Donahoe, J. W., & Palmer, D. C. (1994). Learning and complex behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Genovese, J. E. C. (2007). Evolutionary psychology and behavior analysis: Toward convergence. The Behavior Analyst Today, 8(2), 187–195.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Huitt, W., & Hummel, J. (1997). An introduction to operant (instrumental) conditioning. Educational psychology interactive. Valdosta: Valdosta State University. Retrieved 3 Jan 2018 from http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/behavior/operant.html.

  • Jones, R. T., & Kazdin, A. E. (1975). Programming response maintenance after withdrawing token reinforcement. Behavior Therapy, 6(2), 153–164.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279–296). New York: Appleton -Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, M., Kerr, K. P., & Dillenburger, K. (2000). Parents’ education as autism therapists: Applied behaviour analysis in context. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, E., Barta, S. G., & Kemble, E. D. (1974). Cyclic activity changes during extinction in rats: A potential model for depression. Animal Learning and Behavior, 2, 313–316.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Landrum, T. J., & Kauffman, J. M. (2006). Behavioral approaches to classroom management. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 47–71). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, D. C., & Iwata, B. A. (1995). Prevalence of the extinction burst and its attenuation during treatment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 93–94.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, P. (1999). Establishing operations: Implications for the assessment, treatment and prevention of problem behaviour. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 393–418.

    CrossRef  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Miltenberger, R. G. (2008). Behavior modification: Principles and procedures. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, E. K., Smith, N. G., & Altus, D. E. (2005). B. F. Skinner’s contributions to applied behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 28, 99–131.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mowrer, O. H., & Jones, H. (1945). Habit strength as a function of the pattern of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 293–311.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ormrod, J. E. (2016). Human learning. Boston: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R. A., Honey, P. L., & Symbaluk, D. G. (2017). Introduction to learning and behavior (5th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prados, J., Sansa, J., & Artigas, A. A. (2008). Partial reinforcement effects on learning and extinction of place preference in the water maze. Learning and Behavior, 36(4), 311–318.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, G. S. (1975). A primer of operant conditioning (2nd ed.). Glenview: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1937). Two types of conditioned reflex: A reply to Konorski and Miller. Journal of General Psychology. 16, 272–279.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1948). Superstition in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38(2), 168–172.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1951). How to teach animals. Scientific American, 185(6), 26–29.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1977). Herrnstein and the evolution of behaviorism. American Psychologist, 32, 1006–1012.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213(4507), 501–504.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1984). The evolution of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41(2), 217–221.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Snowman, J., & McCown, R. (2012). Psychology applied to teaching. Stamford: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Mayer, R. (1991). Behavior analysis for lasting change. Fort Worth: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 2(4), i-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. E., & Shea, T. M. (1995). Behavior management: A practical approach for educators. Englewood Cliffs: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeiler, M. D. (1971). Eliminating behavior with reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 16, 401–405.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus

    Ioulia Papageorgi

Authors

  1. Ioulia Papageorgi

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioulia Papageorgi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, USA

    Dr. Todd K. Shackelford

  2. Rochester, Michigan, USA

    Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Section Editor information

  1. University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus

    Menelaos Apostolou

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Papageorgi, I. (2018). Operant Conditioning. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1047-1

When the frequency of a behavior is decreased by learning this is called?

Operant Conditioning. Thorndike and Skinner. Type of learning in which CONSEQUENCES increase or decrease the frequency of a behavior: (Law of effect, operant, reinforcer, punisher)

What leads to a decrease in the frequency of a behavior?

Negative reinforcement always decreases the frequency of behavior, whereas punishment often increases it.

What is an event that decreases the behavior it follows?

Punishment is defined as a consequence that follows an operant response that decreases (or attempts to decrease) the likelihood of that response occurring in the future.

Whats the name for it increase the frequency of a behavior?

Reinforcers. A consequence stimulus that increases the target behavior it follows is referred to as a reinforcer. There are two categories of reinforcers: unconditioned and conditioned.