So sánh cortex a73 vs a76 năm 2024

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (with Adreno 610 graphics) and MediaTek Helio G99 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators

CPU Performance

Single and multi-core processor tests

Gaming Performance

GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan

Battery life

Efficiency of battery consumption

NanoReview Score

Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 680

• 9% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2200 MHz)

Pros of MediaTek Helio G99

• Shows better (up to 33%) AnTuTu 10 score – 412K vs 311K
• Announced 7-months later

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 10

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios

CPU 103958 127892 GPU 40166 65795 Memory 92357 109977 UX 75020 109437 Total score 311285 412885

Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance

Asset compression 90 MB/sec 99.7 MB/sec HTML 5 Browser 46.2 pages/sec 50.6 pages/sec PDF Renderer 64.4 Mpixels/sec 70.6 Mpixels/sec Image detection 16.3 images/sec 40.1 images/sec HDR 51.6 Mpixels/sec 54.6 Mpixels/sec Background blur 3.06 images/sec 6.15 images/sec Photo processing 11.7 images/sec 18.8 images/sec Ray tracing 2.52 Mpixels/sec 2.79 Mpixels/sec

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)

3DMark Wild Life Performance

Stability 90% 99% Graphics test 2 FPS 7 FPS Score 441 1237

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games

PUBG Mobile 59 FPS [Medium] 86 FPS [Low] Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS [Low] 37 FPS [Ultra] Fortnite 23 FPS [Low] - Shadowgun Legends 65 FPS [Low] 91 FPS [Low] World of Tanks Blitz 62 FPS [Medium] 66 FPS [Ultra] Genshin Impact 26 FPS [Low] 48 FPS [Ultra] Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 54 FPS [Ultra] 55 FPS [Ultra] Device Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 1080 x 2400 Cubot X70 1080 x 2408

We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 680 and Helio G99

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) 4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2400 MHz 2200 MHz Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers TDP - 5 W Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 610 Mali-G57 MP2 Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 1st gen GPU frequency 1114 MHz 1100 MHz Execution units 1 2 Shading units 128 64 Total shaders 128 128 FLOPS 284 Gigaflops 281.6 Gigaflops Vulkan version 1.1 1.3 OpenCL version 2.0 2.0 DirectX version 12.1 -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s 17.1 Gbit/s Max size 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2 Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080 Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP Video capture 1K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9 Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem X11 - 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 13 5G support No No Download speed Up to 390 Mbps Up to 650 Mbps Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 5 5 Bluetooth 5.1 5.2 Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?

Snapdragon 680

1119 (14.1%)

Total votes: 7910

Related Comparisons

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G99 and Snapdragon 680, or ask any questions

lint2 21 November 2023 09:37

My dad has the Redmi 10C while I use the Poco M5, 680, and G99. For everyday use, the Poco M5 is markedly snappier and significantly faster in gaming. It's not even close. Unless you're using a clean, debloated, and optimized custom ROM, the G99 far outperforms the 680.

+94 Reply

Oleg 13 October 2023 17:46

The benefit of a SD680 tablet is basically that there is a chance that the device will get a LineageOS port. Mediatek implies no LineageOS at all.

+69 Reply

Not 06 October 2023 15:08

Not really equal to equal here but I would still argue that SD680 is an overall winner in real-life use.

+108 Reply

Potato. 06 October 2023 15:47

No shot. The g99 is far superior due to much newer core technology. Specs seem similar on paper but in practice and with the same RAM amount, the g99 smokes the 680.

+46 Reply

Hocn 06 October 2023 17:11

I mean i get what you mean but the only thing sd 680 is winning her is battery life since the g99 is made for gaming and the 680 is just for general use so you are correct but not really.

+20 Reply

p51 10 October 2023 22:10

For general use, the experience on the G99 is significantly better than on the 680. I use the SD 7 Gen 1, and it feels laggy. If I were looking for a more affordable tablet, the G99 would be my choice.

+31 Reply

MKPROHD 15 February 2023 17:10

Efficiency used to be the strong argument in favor of snapdragon processors, but now MediaTek is just plain better.