1660 super vs 1080 là 2 chiếc card đồ hoạ sẽ xuất hiện trong bài so sánh hiệu năng ngày hôm nay đó chính là gtx 1660 vs rx 570. Hãy cùng đi tìm hiểu về sức mạnh hiệu năng của 2 chiếc card đồ hoạ kể trên qua bài viết này. Show
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores35841536Core clock speed1481 MHz1500 MHzBoost clock speed1600 MHz1770 MHzNumber of transistors11,800 million6,600 millionManufacturing process technology16 nm12 nmPower consumption (TDP)250 Watt120 WattMaximum GPU temperature91 °Cno dataTexture fill rate354.4169.9Floating-point performance11,340 gflopsno data Size and compatibilityInformation on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16Length10.5" (26.7 cm)229 mmWidth2-slot2-slotRecommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno dataSupplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pinSLI options+no data MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6Maximum RAM amount11 GB6 GBMemory bus width352 Bit192 BitMemory clock speed11000 MHz12000 MHzMemory bandwidth484.4 GB/s288.0 GB/sShared memory-- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortMulti monitor support+no dataHDMI++G-SYNC support+no data TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. GPU Boost3.0no dataAnsel+no data API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)Shader Model6.46.5OpenGL4.54.6OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan+1.2.131CUDA+7.5 Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. 1080 Ti outperforms 1660 Ti by 43% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 1080 Ti outperforms 1660 Ti by 43% in Passmark. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% 1080 Ti outperforms 1660 Ti by 65% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% 1080 Ti outperforms 1660 Ti by 72% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% GTX 1080 Ti 142490 +53.1% 1080 Ti outperforms 1660 Ti by 53% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% 1660 Ti outperforms 1080 Ti by 1% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. 3DMark Ice Storm GPUIce Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% GTX 1660 Ti 483604 +22.5% 1660 Ti outperforms 1080 Ti by 23% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU. GeekBench 5 VulkanGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% 1080 Ti outperforms 1660 Ti by 44% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan. GeekBench 5 CUDAGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 4% 1660 Ti outperforms 1080 Ti by 18% in GeekBench 5 CUDA. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04Benchmark coverage: 3% 1080 Ti outperforms 1660 Ti by 95% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03Benchmark coverage: 3% 1080 Ti outperforms 1660 Ti by 30% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02Benchmark coverage: 3% 1080 Ti outperforms 1660 Ti by 27% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04Benchmark coverage: 3% 1080 Ti outperforms 1660 Ti by 105% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01Benchmark coverage: 3% 1080 Ti outperforms 1660 Ti by 51% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01Benchmark coverage: 3% 1080 Ti outperforms 1660 Ti by 118% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01. SPECviewperf 12 - MayaThis part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes. Benchmark coverage: 2% 1080 Ti outperforms 1660 Ti by 42% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05Benchmark coverage: 2% 1660 Ti outperforms 1080 Ti by 10% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05. SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds MaxThis part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games. Benchmark coverage: 1% 1660 Ti outperforms 1080 Ti by 8% in SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max. Mining hashratesCryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 1427 Mh/s no data Decred / DCR (Decred) 4.6 Gh/s no data Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 35 Mh/s no data Siacoin / SC (Sia) 2.96 Gh/s no data Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.76 kh/s no data Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 630 Sol/s no data Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Full HD129 105 1440p85 59 4K66 38 Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 207785−90 78 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey100 +16.3% 86 −16.3% Assassin's Creed Valhalla80−85 +12.2% 74 −12.2% Battlefield 5166 +28.7% 129 −28.7% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare130−140 +9.2% 120 −9.2% Cyberpunk 207785−90 +23.9% 71 −23.9% Far Cry 5120 +10.1% 109 −10.1% Far Cry New Dawn104 +6.1% 98 −6.1% Forza Horizon 4147 +12.2% 131 −12.2% Hitman 3150−160 +45.7% 100−110 −45.7% Horizon Zero Dawn100−110 +44.4% 70−75 −44.4% Red Dead Redemption 275−80 −6.5% 82 +6.5% Shadow of the Tomb Raider120 +27.7% 94 −27.7% Watch Dogs: Legion85−90 +36.5% 60−65 −36.5% Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey90 +25% 72 −25% Assassin's Creed Valhalla80−85 +50.9% 55 −50.9% Battlefield 5154 +37.5% 112 −37.5% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare61 −45.9% 89 +45.9% Cyberpunk 207785−90 +54.4% 57 −54.4% Far Cry 5117 +18.2% 99 −18.2% Far Cry New Dawn102 +9.7% 93 −9.7% Forza Horizon 4145 +18.9% 122 −18.9% Hitman 3150−160 +45.7% 100−110 −45.7% Horizon Zero Dawn100−110 +44.4% 70−75 −44.4% Metro Exodus90 +63.6% 55 −63.6% Red Dead Redemption 265 +44.4% 45 −44.4% Shadow of the Tomb Raider113 +37.8% 82 −37.8% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt130−140 +12.1% 116 −12.1% Watch Dogs: Legion85−90 +36.5% 60−65 −36.5% Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey71 +34% 53 −34% Assassin's Creed Valhalla80−85 +66% 50 −66% Battlefield 5149 +46.1% 102 −46.1% Cyberpunk 207785−90 +91.3% 46 −91.3% Far Cry 5109 +16% 94 −16% Far Cry New Dawn94 +11.9% 84 −11.9% Forza Horizon 4120 +23.7% 97 −23.7% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt98 +58.1% 62 −58.1% Watch Dogs: Legion85−90 +36.5% 60−65 −36.5% 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare91 +59.6% 57 −59.6% Hitman 390−95 +56.7% 60−65 −56.7% Horizon Zero Dawn70−75 +54.3% 45−50 −54.3% Metro Exodus56 +69.7% 33 −69.7% Red Dead Redemption 241 +46.4% 28 −46.4% Shadow of the Tomb Raider73 +43.1% 51 −43.1% 1440p Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey62 +51.2% 41 −51.2% Assassin's Creed Valhalla55−60 +52.8% 36 −52.8% Battlefield 5118 +55.3% 76 −55.3% Cyberpunk 207740−45 +55.6% 27 −55.6% Far Cry 597 +44.8% 67 −44.8% Far Cry New Dawn88 +35.4% 65 −35.4% Forza Horizon 4102 +32.5% 77 −32.5% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt75−80 +57.1% 45−50 −57.1% Watch Dogs: Legion45−50 +58.6% 27−30 −58.6% 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare52 +67.7% 31 −67.7% Hitman 350−55 +54.5% 30−35 −54.5% Horizon Zero Dawn35−40 +62.5% 24−27 −62.5% Metro Exodus35 +66.7% 21 −66.7% Red Dead Redemption 227 +42.1% 19 −42.1% Shadow of the Tomb Raider41 +57.7% 26 −57.7% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt72 +67.4% 43 −67.4% 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey40 +60% 25 −60% Assassin's Creed Valhalla30−35 +73.7% 19 −73.7% Battlefield 570 +62.8% 43 −62.8% Cyberpunk 207718−20 +72.7% 11 −72.7% Far Cry 555 +57.1% 35 −57.1% Far Cry New Dawn57 +62.9% 35 −62.9% Forza Horizon 475 +47.1% 51 −47.1% Watch Dogs: Legion24−27 +52.9% 16−18 −52.9% This is how GTX 1080 Ti and GTX 1660 Ti compete in popular games: 1080p resolution:
1440p resolution:
4K resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 47.79 33.35 Recency 28 February 2017 22 February 2019 Cost $699 $279 Memory bus width 352 192 Pipelines / CUDA cores 3584 1536 Memory bandwidth 484.4 288 Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 120 Watt The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:  Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
