Yükseliş. Mevcut AORUS X7 DT en hızlı oyun laptoplarından biri. Yeni model de ise Coffe Lake hexa-core işlemci, GeForce GTX 1080 grafik kartı ve 144 Hz ekran kullanılmış. Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Felicitas Krohn, Published 07/20/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 İşlemci Intel Core i7-8850H 6 x 2.6 - 4.3 GHz, Coffee Lake-H Bellek 16 GB , Two 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4 2666 modules, Dual Channel. Two of four SO-DIMM slots occupied. Maximum of 64 GB RAM supported. Görüntü 17.30 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, G-Sync, X-Rite Pantone , parlak: hayır Harddisk Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, 512 GB , SSD & HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD, 7,200 RPM. Two M.2-2280 slots & one 2.5-inch drive bay. Ses kartı Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH Bağlantılar 3 USB 3.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: Headphone jack, Microphone jack, Kart okuyucular: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor Network Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1 Boyut yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 25 x 428 x 305 Batarya 94.24 Wh Lithium-Polymer İşletim sistemi Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit Ek özellikler Hoparlörler: Two 2 W speakers, two 2 W woofers., Klavye: Chiclet, RGB, Klavye ışığı: evet, 265 W power supply, USB key containing software, Feet, Quick Start Guide, Warranty Information, Stickers, Adobe Reader XI, numerous manufacturer tools, Killer Performance Suite, MS Office trial, XSplit Broadcaster trial, XSplit Gamecaster Trial, 24 Ay Garanti Ağırlık 3.374 kg, Güç kaynağı: 638 g Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications. Alienware 17 R4 Aorus X7 DT v8 Aorus X7 DT v6 MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Razer Blade Pro 2017 SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 DIN A4 424 mm 332 mm 29.9 mm 4.4 kg428 mm 305 mm 25 mm 3.4 kg426 mm 308 mm 25 mm 3.3 kg419 mm 287 mm 30 mm 2.9 kg424 mm 281 mm 22.5 mm 3.6 kg419 mm 287 mm 25 mm 3.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g Networking iperf3 transmit AX12Average of class Gaming (885 - 1412, n=7, last 2 years) 1147 MBit/s +91% MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Intel Wireless-AC 9560 662 MBit/s +11% Aorus X7 DT v8 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter 599 MBit/s Alienware 17 R4 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter 589 MBit/s -2% SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter 554 MBit/s -8% Razer Blade Pro 2017 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter 528 MBit/s -12% iperf3 receive AX12Average of class Gaming (881 - 1700, n=7, last 2 years) 1391 MBit/s +112% MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Intel Wireless-AC 9560 693 MBit/s +6% SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter 687 MBit/s +5% Razer Blade Pro 2017 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter 671 MBit/s +2% Aorus X7 DT v8 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter 655 MBit/s Alienware 17 R4 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter 606 MBit/s -7% 287 cd/m²289 cd/m²267 cd/m²306 cd/m²297 cd/m²288 cd/m²275 cd/m²261 cd/m²257 cd/m² Parlaklığın yayılımı AU Optronics B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2 Maksimum: 306 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 280.8 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m² Aydınlatma: 84 % Batarya modunda parlaklık: 297 cd/m² Kontrast: 1291:1 (Siyah: 0.23 cd/m²) ΔE Color 2.19 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5 ΔE Greyscale 1.31 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3 91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D) 66.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D) 91.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D) 65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D) Gamma: 2.42 Aorus X7 DT v8 AU Optronics B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080Aorus X7 DT v6 AUO1096, TN LED, 2560x1440Razer Blade Pro 2017 Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 3840x2160Alienware 17 R4 TN LED, 2560x1440SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Chi Mei N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN WLED, 1920x1080Display -9% 32% -8% 30% 26% Display P3 Coverage 65.3 59.6 -9% 88.9 36% 61.2 -6% 85.9 32% 90.8 39% sRGB Coverage 91.2 82.8 -9% 100 10% 82.9 -9% 99.9 10% 99.9 10% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage 66.3 60.1 -9% 99.7 50% 60.5 -9% 98.9 49% 85.8 29% Response Times -15% -229% -37% -126% -35% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * 18 (8.8, 9.2) 21.6 (12.4, 9.2) -20% 60.8 (28.8, 32) -238% 30 (18.8, 11.2) -67% 44 (21.2, 22.8) -144% 28 (16.4, 11.6) -56% Response Time Black / White * 12 (6.8, 5.2) 13.2 (4.4, 8.8) -10% 38.4 (22, 16.4) -220% 12.8 (10.8, 2) -7% 24.8 (11.6, 13.2) -107% 13.6 (11.8, 1.8) -13% PWM Frequency 59.5 204.9 (20) 25000 (14) Screen -86% -51% -69% -46% -23% Brightness middle 297 339.5 14% 230 -23% 402.3 35% 303 2% 273 -8% Brightness 281 309 10% 207 -26% 372 32% 287 2% 273 -3% Brightness Distribution 84 80 -5% 83 -1% 86 2% 83 -1% 90 7% Black Level * 0.23 0.45 -96% 0.2 13% 0.62 -170% 0.25 -9% 0.26 -13% Contrast 1291 754 -42% 1150 -11% 649 -50% 1212 -6% 1050 -19% Colorchecker dE 2000 * 2.19 6.88 -214% 5.62 -157% 5.6 -156% 4.38 -100% 3.52 -61% Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * 4.81 9.99 -108% 10.24 -113% 9.8 -104% 7.42 -54% 6.34 -32% Greyscale dE 2000 * 1.31 6.57 -402% 4.54 -247% 4.7 -259% 5.96 -355% 3.11 -137% Gamma 2.42 91% 2.04 108% 2.36 93% 2.14 103% 2.31 95% 2.43 91% CCT 6464 101% 8608 76% 6625 98% 7519 86% 6247 104% 6999 93% Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) 59 54 -8% 88 49% 53.7 -9% 87 47% 76 29% Color Space (Percent of sRGB) 91 82 -10% 100 10% 82.2 -10% 100 10% 100 10% Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * 2.09 Total Average (Program / Settings) -37% / -61% -83% / -58% -38% / -52% -47% / -42% -11% / -15% * ... smaller is better Display Response Timesℹ Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise ↘ 5.2 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.8 ms rise ↘ 9.2 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms). Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹ To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether. Screen flickering / PWM not detected In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. 010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280Tooltip Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit 2.07 Points Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit 14.02 Points Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit 182 Points Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit 1276 Points Yardım PCMark 10 - ScoreAverage of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=203, last 2 years) 7573 Points +67% MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY 5465 Points +21% SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe 4571 Points +1% Aorus X7 DT v8 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 4524 Points Razer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) 3991 Points -12% PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2Aorus X7 DT v8 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 5779 Points Average of class Gaming (4166 - 6657, n=36, last 2 years) 5264 Points -9% Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e 5096 Points -12% Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB 5064 Points -12% Razer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) 4531 Points -22% MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY 4498 Points -22% SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe 3635 Points -37% PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 5779 puanPCMark 10 Score 4524 puan Yardım Aorus X7 DT v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7Aorus X7 DT v6 Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-eRazer Blade Pro 2017 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)Alienware 17 R4 SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GBSCHENKER XMG Pro 17 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMeMSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NYAS SSD 26% 7% -5% 57% -63% Seq Read 2182 1971 -10% 2599 19% 1752 -20% 2746 26% 511 -77% Seq Write 1342 1494 11% 588 -56% 735 -45% 1673 25% 425.7 -68% 4K Read 23.28 48.93 110% 37.57 61% 35.61 53% 45.58 96% 14.07 -40% 4K Write 89.9 149.1 66% 104.4 16% 113.4 26% 154.2 72% 38.34 -57% Score Read 1058 1353 28% 1414 34% 831 -21% 1711 62% 417 -61% Score Write 981 665 -32% 676 -31% 858 -13% 1558 59% 254 -74% Score Total 2539 2695 6% 2715 7% 2072 -18% 4093 61% 881 -65% CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2414 MB/s CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1562 MB/s CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 366.8 MB/s CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 305.7 MB/s CDM 5 Read Seq: 1362 MB/s CDM 5 Write Seq: 1340 MB/s CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 30.76 MB/s CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 88.6 MB/s 3DMark 11 Performance 20577 puan3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score 177420 puan3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score 39020 puan3DMark Fire Strike Score 18006 puan Yardım 01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677787980Tooltip The Witcher 3 ultra Ses yüksekliği Boşta 35 / 36 / 41 dB HDD 33 dBÇalışırken 43 / 54 dB 30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 29 dB(A)Aorus X7 DT v8 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8850HAorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HKRazer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HKAlienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HKSCHENKER XMG Pro 17 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQMSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750HAverage of class Gaming Noise 0% 5% 1% 2% 6% 16% off / environment * 29 28.6 1% 30 -3% 28.2 3% 29 -0% 30 -3% 24.1 (19.5 - 29.9, n=188, last 2 years) 17% Idle Minimum * 35 32.2 8% 30 14% 35.6 -2% 32 9% 32 9% 25.7 (21.9 - 41.6, n=189, last 2 years) 27% Idle Average * 36 35.2 2% 31 14% 35.6 1% 33 8% 33 8% 27.4 (21.9 - 42.1, n=189, last 2 years) 24% Idle Maximum * 41 35.2 14% 33 20% 35.7 13% 35 15% 34 17% 30.8 (21.9 - 47, n=189, last 2 years) 25% Load Average * 43 51.7 -20% 43 -0% 50.2 -17% 50 -16% 41 5% 43 (25.2 - 62.9, n=189, last 2 years) -0% Witcher 3 ultra * 53 55 -4% 50.2 5% 52 2% 50 6% Load Maximum * 54 55.7 -3% 58 -7% 50.2 7% 56 -4% 54 -0% 53.3 (42.1 - 68.2, n=189, last 2 years) 1% * ... smaller is better 45 °C51 °C49 °C 43 °C47 °C46 °C 39 °C39 °C38 °C Maksimum: 51 °C Ortalama: 44.1 °C 63 °C62 °C52 °C63 °C62 °C53 °C42 °C43 °C39 °C Maksimum: 63 °C Ortalama: 53.2 °C Güç kaynağı 60 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900 (-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming. (-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming. (-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63 °C / 145 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F (+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F. (-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F. (±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F). Aorus X7 DT v8 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8850HAorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HKRazer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HKAlienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HKSCHENKER XMG Pro 17 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQMSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750HAverage of class Gaming Heat 5% -13% 0% 4% -3% -1% Maximum Upper Side * 51 45.4 11% 53 -4% 49.6 3% 55 -8% 47 8% 46.3 (28.2 - 61, n=190, last 2 years) 9% Maximum Bottom * 63 58.2 8% 53 16% 56 11% 56 11% 49 22% 49.7 (30 - 66.3, n=190, last 2 years) 21% Idle Upper Side * 27 27.4 -1% 35 -30% 29.6 -10% 25 7% 32 -19% 31.5 (21.2 - 43, n=190, last 2 years) -17% Idle Bottom * 28 27.2 3% 37 -32% 29.2 -4% 26 7% 34 -21% 32.7 (22.6 - 45, n=190, last 2 years) -17% * ... smaller is better dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.543.4253538.13130.930.94034.536.55027.828.66326.630.98028.643.910028.359.112525.551.516022.74720024.95625023.65731520.660.540019.364.950018.368.463017.772.280017.569100017.876.3125017.474.616001771.8200017.169.1250017.371.6315017.171400017.364.750001766.8630017.169.7800017.265.31000017.263125001758.51600016.951.8SPL29.882.8N1.356.2median 17.4median 65.3Delta1.96.538.440.5323228.431.233.338.136.638.42741.225.848.930.451.524.949.524.957.824.963.424.16822.271.219.869.919.472.119.177.418.975.518.470.618.57018.474.118.472.518.771.619.170.719.166.119.458.719.554.919.755.320.35920.948.120.750.931.583.11.656.2median 19.5median 682.17.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus X7 DT v8Razer Blade Pro 2017 Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices) Aorus X7 DT v8 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB) Bass 100 - 315 Hz (±) | reduced bass - on average 10.2% lower than median (±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency) Mids 400 - 2000 Hz (±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median (±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency) Highs 2 - 16 kHz (+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median (+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency) Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz (+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median) Compared to same class » 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 69% worse » The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132% Compared to all devices tested » 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse » The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134% Razer Blade Pro 2017 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB) Bass 100 - 315 Hz (±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median (±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency) Mids 400 - 2000 Hz (+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median (+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency) Highs 2 - 16 kHz (±) | reduced highs - on average 7.5% lower than median (+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency) Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz (±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median) Compared to same class » 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 46% worse » The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132% Compared to all devices tested » 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 67% worse » The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134% Aorus X7 DT v8 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8850HAorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HKRazer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HKAlienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HKSCHENKER XMG Pro 17 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQMSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750HAverage of class Gaming Power Consumption -20% -7% -11% 29% 25% 25% Idle Minimum * 23 31.5 -37% 31 -35% 37.5 -63% 13 43% 15 35% 13.8 (2 - 64, n=184, last 2 years) 40% Idle Average * 33 33.9 -3% 36 -9% 37.6 -14% 19 42% 20 39% 19.1 (8 - 67, n=184, last 2 years) 42% Idle Maximum * 37 34.6 6% 44 -19% 37.6 -2% 26 30% 26 30% 26.6 (9 - 101.1, n=184, last 2 years) 28% Load Average * 115 205.6 -79% 107 7% 122.4 -6% 95 17% 97 16% 111 (32.1 - 202, n=184, last 2 years) 3% Witcher 3 ultra * 225 212 6% 180.3 20% 179 20% 186 17% Load Maximum * 281 250.8 11% 258 8% 277.4 1% 220 22% 239 15% 250 (64.5 - 418, n=183, last 2 years) 11% * ... smaller is better Batarya ömrü Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)4h 56minWiFi Websurfing3h 48minÇalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)1h 20min Aorus X7 DT v8 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8850H, 94.24 WhAorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 94 WhRazer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 99 WhAlienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 99 WhSCHENKER XMG Pro 17 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 66 WhMSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 51 WhAverage of class Gaming Battery Runtime -19% -9% -14% 15% -23% 50% Reader / Idle 296 182 -39% 253 -15% 276 -7% 397 34% 303 2% 541 (57 - 1290, n=87, last 2 years) 83% WiFi v1.3 228 144 -37% 197 -14% 181 -21% 218 -4% 186 -18% 364 (57 - 745, n=188, last 2 years) 60% Load 80 94 18% 81 1% 69 -14% 91 14% 38 -52% 85.5 (36 - 173, n=150, last 2 years) 7% H.264 204 222 193 391 (56 - 747, n=95, last 2 years) Artılar
Eksiler- Yüksek sıcaklık ve fan sesi - İç donanım çabuk tozlanıyor - Ortalama batarya süresi - Hoparlörlerden ortalama ses The AORUS X7 DT v8 in review. Test device courtesy of Gigabyte Germany.AORUS X7 D/ v8, Gigabyte'ın akıllıca ürettiği oyun cihazlarından biri olmaya devam ediyor. X7 DT v8 sağlam metal kasası için ek puan alırken, iyi port seçimi ve yüksek kontrastlı 144 HZ IPS ekranı ile de göz dolduruyor. Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 grafik kartı, 144 Hz ekran ve Nvidia G-Sync ile akıcı bir oyun performansı sunuluyor. Intel Core i7-8850H ile önümüzdeki birkaç yıl güvence altına alınırken, 16 GB RAM ve NVMe SSD ile uygulama bağımsız akıcı bir sistem sağlanmış. Yüksek performanslı bileşenler, yüksek yüzey sıcaklığı ve fan sesi olarak dönüyor. X7 DT v8 yoğun kullanımda yanına yaklaşılmayacak kadar olmasa da oldukça ısınıyor. Yüksek güç tüketimi, kart değişim teknolojisinden yoksunluğundan ötürü 94 Wh gibi bir batarya olmasına rağmen ortalama bir kullanım süresi sunuyor. Fiyatı düşünüldüğünde hoparlörlerin de daha iyi olması gerekirdi. |