Published on April 2, 2021 by Pritha Bhandari. Revised on October 10, 2022. In an experiment, an extraneous variable is any variable that you’re not investigating
that can potentially affect the outcomes of your research study. If left uncontrolled, extraneous variables can lead to inaccurate conclusions about the relationship between independent and dependent variables. Extraneous variables can threaten the internal validity of your study by providing alternative explanations for your results. In an experiment, you manipulate an
independent variable to study its effects on a dependent variable. You recruit students from a university to participate in the study. You
manipulate the independent variable by splitting participants into two groups: All participants are given a scientific knowledge
quiz, and their scores are compared between groups. When extraneous variables are uncontrolled, it’s hard to determine the exact effects of the independent variable on the dependent variable, because the effects of extraneous variables may mask them. Uncontrolled extraneous variables can also make it seem as though there is a true effect of the independent variable in an experiment when there’s actually none. If these variables systematically differ between the groups, you can’t be sure whether
your results come from your independent variable manipulation or from the extraneous variables. Controlling extraneous variables is an important aspect of experimental design. When you control an extraneous variable, you turn it into a control variable. A confounding variable is a type of extraneous variable that is associated with both the independent and dependent variables.
In a conceptual framework diagram, you can draw an arrow from a confounder to the independent variable as well as to the dependent variable. You can draw an arrow from extraneous variables to a dependent variable. Example: Confounding vs. extraneous variablesHaving participants who work in scientific professions (in labs) is a confounding variable in your study, because this type of work correlates with wearing a lab coat and better scientific reasoning.People who work in labs would regularly wear lab coats and may have higher scientific knowledge in general. Therefore, it’s unlikely that your manipulation will increase scientific reasoning abilities for these participants. Variables that only impact on scientific reasoning are extraneous variables. These include participants’ interests in science and undergraduate majors. While interest in science may affect scientific reasoning ability, it’s not necessarily related to wearing a lab coat. Receive feedback on language, structure and formattingProfessional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:
See an example Types and controls of extraneous variablesDemand characteristicsDemand characteristics are cues that encourage participants to conform to researchers’ behavioral expectations. Sometimes, participants can infer the intentions behind a research study from the materials or experimental settings, and use these hints to act in ways that are consistent with study hypotheses. These demand characteristics can bias the study outcomes and reduce the external validity, or generalizability, of the results. Example: Demand characteristicsResearch participants in the experimental group easily draw links between the lab setting, being asked to wear lab coats, and the questions on their scientific knowledge.They work harder to do well on the quiz by paying more attention to the questions. You can avoid demand characteristics by making it difficult for participants to guess the aim of your study. Ask participants to perform unrelated filler tasks or fill out plausibly relevant surveys to lead them away from the true nature of the study. Experimenter effectsExperimenter effects are unintentional actions by researchers that can influence study outcomes. There are two main types of experimenter effects:
Participants wearing the non-lab coats are not encouraged to perform well on the quiz. Therefore, they don’t work as hard on their responses. To avoid experimenter effects, you can implement masking (blinding) to hide the condition assignment from participants and experimenters. In a double-blind study, researchers won’t be able to bias participants towards acting in expected ways or selectively interpret results to suit their hypotheses. Situational variablesSituational variables, such as lighting or temperature, can alter participants’ behaviors in study environments. These factors are sources of random error or random variation in your measurements. To understand the true relationship between independent and dependent variables, you’ll need to reduce or eliminate the effect of situational factors on your study outcomes. Example: Situational variableTo perform your experiment, you use the lab rooms on campus. They are only available either early in the morning or late in the day. Because time of day may affect test performance, it’s an extraneous variable.To avoid situational variables from influencing study outcomes, it’s best to hold variables constant throughout the study or statistically account for them in your analyses. Participant variablesA participant variable is any characteristic or aspect of a participant’s background that could affect study results, even though it’s not the focus of an experiment. Participant variables can include sex, gender identity, age, educational attainment, marital status, religious affiliation, etc. Since these individual differences between participants may lead to different outcomes, it’s important to measure and analyze these variables. Example: Participant variablesEducational background and undergraduate majors are important participant variables for your study on scientific reasoning. Participants with strong educational backgrounds in STEM subjects are likely to perform better than others.To control participant variables, you should aim to use random assignment to divide your sample into control and experimental groups. Random assignment makes your groups comparable by evenly distributing participant characteristics between them. An extraneous variableis any variable that you’re not investigating that can potentially affect the dependent variable of your research study. A confounding variable is a type of extraneous variable that not only affects the dependent variable, but is also related to the independent variable. There are 4 main types of extraneous variables:
Cite this Scribbr articleIf you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
Is this article helpful?You have already voted. Thanks :-) Your vote is saved :-) Processing your vote... What is the strongest method of controlling for intrinsic subject factors?The strongest method of controlling for intrinsic (subject) factors is randomization. It is the most effective method of controlling participants' characteristics.
Which of the following is the best method to achieve randomization in an experimental study?The most common and basic method of simple randomization is flipping a coin. For example, with two treatment groups (control versus treatment), the side of the coin (i.e., heads - control, tails - treatment) determines the assignment of each subject.
Which of the following is the most effective way to minimize the effect of all extraneous variables between the experimental group and the control group?Random Assignment. The primary way that researchers accomplish this kind of control of extraneous variables across conditions is called random assignment , which means using a random process to decide which participants are tested in which conditions.
What are the 4 types of experimental design?Four major design types with relevance to user research are experimental, quasi-experimental, correlational and single subject. These research designs proceed from a level of high validity and generalizability to ones with lower validity and generalizability.
|