So sánh ryzen 3 2200g và i5 8400 năm 2024

Comparing Core i5-8400 and Ryzen 3 2200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingPlace by popularitynot in top-100Value for money6.4711.59Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processorSeriesIntel Core i5AMD Ryzen 3Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-S (2017−2018)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)Release date5 October 2017 (6 years old)12 February 2018 (6 years old)Launch price (MSRP)$182$99Current price$254 (1.4x MSRP)$111 (1.1x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 2200G has 79% better value for money than i5-8400.

Technical specs

Core i5-8400 and Ryzen 3 2200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)Threads64Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.5 GHzBoost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHzBus support4 × 8 GT/sno dataL1 cache64K (per core)128K (per core)L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)L3 cache9 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)Chip lithography14 nm14 nmDie size149 mm2210 mm2Maximum core temperature100 °Cno dataMaximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno dataNumber of transistorsno data4,950 million64 bit support++Windows 11 compatibility+-Unlocked multiplier-1

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-8400 and Ryzen 3 2200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)SocketFCLGA1151AM4Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-8400 and Ryzen 3 2200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTAES-NI++FMAno data+AVX++vPro+no dataEnhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no dataTurbo Boost Technology2.0no dataHyper-Threading Technology-no dataTSX-no dataIdle States+no dataThermal Monitoring+no dataSIPP-no dataStatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i5-8400 and Ryzen 3 2200G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no dataEDB+no dataSecure Key+no dataMPX+no dataIdentity Protection+no dataSGXYes with Intel® MEno dataOS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-8400 and Ryzen 3 2200G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++VT-d+no dataVT-x+no dataEPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-8400 and Ryzen 3 2200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4 Dual-channelMaximum memory size128 GB64 GBMax memory channels22Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s46.933 GB/sECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card CompareIntel UHD Graphics 630AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)Max video memory64 GBno dataQuick Sync Video+no dataClear Video+no dataClear Video HD+no dataGraphics max frequency1.05 GHzno dataInTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-8400 and Ryzen 3 2200G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-8400 and Ryzen 3 2200G integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no dataMax resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno dataMax resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno dataMax resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-8400 and Ryzen 3 2200G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no dataOpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-8400 and Ryzen 3 2200G.

PCIe version3.03.0PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core i5-8400 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 36% in our combined benchmark results.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core i5-8400 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 37% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core i5-8400 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 36% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core i5-8400 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 67% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core i5-8400 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 38% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core i5-8400 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 85% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core i5-8400 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 43% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Core i5-8400 by 74% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Core i5-8400 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 65% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Core i5-8400 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 63% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Core i5-8400 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 16% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Core i5-8400 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 13% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Core i5-8400 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 61% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Core i5-8400 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 60% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Core i5-8400 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 22% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Core i5-8400 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 55% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Core i5-8400 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 76% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Core i5-8400 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 22% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score 5.99 4.39 Integrated graphics card 3.07 4.48 Recency 5 October 2017 12 February 2018 Physical cores 6 4 Threads 6 4 Cost $182 $99 Boost clock speed 4000 3700 Base clock speed 2800 3500

The Core i5-8400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 2200G in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-8400 and Ryzen 3 2200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Core i5-8400

Ryzen 3 2200G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

Rate Intel Core i5-8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Rate AMD Ryzen 3 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-8400 or Ryzen 3 2200G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.