Non compliance with laws and regulations

Responding to Non-compliance with Laws and Regulations (NOCLAR) provides a framework for all members on how best to act in the public interest when they become aware of non-compliance or suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations.

It allows members to set aside the principle of confidentiality and report NOCLAR to an appropriate authority, if that is in the public interest.

NOCLAR became effective from 1 January 2018.

See: Amendments to APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants due to revisions to IESBA’s Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants

What is NOCLAR?

NOCLAR is any act of omission or commission, intentional or unintentional, committed by a client or employer. This includes acts taken by management or by those charged with governance, or by others working for, or under the direction of, the client or employer, which is contrary to prevailing laws or regulations.

Which laws and regulations?

  • Laws and regulations that have a direct effect on the determination of material amounts and disclosures in the financial statements
  • Other laws and regulations, even if they do not have a direct effect on financial statements, compliance with which may be fundamental to the entity’s operations, business, or where non-compliance may lead to material penalties.

Are the requirements the same for all members?

NOCLAR provides different requirements for:

  • auditors
  • other members in public practice
  • senior members in business such as directors, officers or senior employees
  • other members in business.

Are members required to disclose NOCLAR to an appropriate authority?  

NOCLAR does not impose an obligation to members to disclose a non-compliance, or suspected non-compliance to an authority, when there is no legal obligation to do so.

However, members must comply with the relevant NOCLAR requirements and consider whether disclosure to an appropriate authority is the right  course of action in the circumstances.

These vary depending on the role and specific characteristics of each case, but there are requirements for members to respond to NOCLAR and not turn a blind eye.

If a member decides that disclosure of NOCLAR to an appropriate authority is the right course of action in the circumstances, then such a disclosure will not be considered a breach of confidentiality.

Members are required to act in good faith and exercise caution.

Members cannot disclose NOCLAR to an appropriate authority if doing so would be contrary to law or regulation.

AS 2405 establishes requirements regarding the auditor's consideration of a company's possible illegal acts in an audit of financial statements. While the standard has remained largely unchanged since its issuance in 1988, the following developments have taken place:

  • Adoption of the Board's Risk Assessment Standards: AS 2405 predates the adoption of the Board's risk assessment standards and therefore, might need to be modified;
  • Companies' Ethics and Compliance Programs: There have been significant changes affecting companies' approaches to complying with applicable laws and regulations, as well as investor expectations; and
  • ICFR and Whistleblower Programs: There have also been important statutory developments. As part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in addition to requiring certain companies and their external auditors to report on the adequacy of the internal control over financial reporting, Congress also required public company audit committees to establish whistleblower programs for submission of anonymous tips and complaints related to accounting, auditing, and internal control matters.

Staff analysis will take into account observations from the Board's oversight activities, audit firms' methodologies, academic research, the activities of other standard setters and regulators, and information from investors and other stakeholders.

What are some examples of non compliance?

Examples of non compliance include:.
Failure to wear personal protective equipment (PPE).
Insufficient administration of operations..
Failure to obtain proper certifications/illegal operations..
Failure to follow operation procedures..
Failure to report to relevant authorities..

What are the 3 consequences for non compliance?

Consequences of Non-Compliance.
Fines. Fines are a common punishment for instances of non-compliance. ... .
Prison. Prison sentences can be issued for individuals found to be in non-compliance with certain laws. ... .
Damaged Reputation. ... .
Business Closure. ... .
Worker Safety. ... .
Employee Compensation. ... .
Discriminatory Employment Practices..

What is the management's responsibility in non compliance with laws and regulations?

It is the responsibility of the employing organisation's management and those charged with governance, to ensure that their business activities are conducted in accordance with laws and regulations and to identify any form of non-compliance by any of its stakeholders.

What could be the consequences of non compliance with?

But no matter the context, noncompliance with regulations or legislation generally has serious repercussions for businesses — reputational, financial, even criminal charges and prison time. The move towards individual accountability for compliance failings makes noncompliance both a corporate and personal concern.