Cited literature Abadchi, J.K., Nazari-Ahangarkolaee, M., Gattas, S., Bermudez-Contreras, E., Luczak, A., McNaughton, B.L., and Mohajerani, M.H. (2020). Spatiotemporal patterns of neocortical activity around hippocampal sharp-wave ripples. Elife 9, 1-26. Fernandez-Ruiz, A., Oliva, A., Oliveira, E.F. De, Rocha-Almeida, F., Tingley, D., and Buzsáki, G. (2019). Long-duration hippocampal sharp wave ripples improve memory. Science (80-. ). 364, 1082-1086. Van Groen, T., and Wyss, J.M. (2003). Connections of the Retrosplenial Granular b Cortex in the Rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 463, 249-263. Luczak, A., Bartho, P., and Harris, K.D. (2013). Gating of Sensory Input by Spontaneous Cortical Activity. J. Neurosci. 33, 1684-1695. Ma, Y., Shaik, M.A., Kim, S.H., Kozberg, M.G., Thibodeaux, D.N., Zhao, H.T., Yu, H., and Hillman, E.M.C. (2016). Wide-field optical mapping of neural activity and brain haemodynamics: considerations and novel approaches. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 371. McGinley, M.J., David, S. V., and McCormick, D.A. (2015). Cortical Membrane Potential Signature of Optimal States for Sensory Signal Detection. Neuron 87, 179-192. Nitzan, N., Swanson, R., Schmitz, D., and Buzsáki, G. (2022). Brain-wide interactions during hippocampal sharp wave ripples. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119. Pernet, C.R., Latinus, M., Nichols, T.E., and Rousselet, G.A. (2015). Cluster-based computational methods for mass univariate analyses of event-related brain potentials/fields: A simulation study. J. Neurosci. Methods 250, 85-93. Petersen, C.C.H., Hahn, T.T.G., Sakmann, B., Grinvald, A., and Mehta, M. (2003). Interaction of sensory responses with spontaneous depolarization in layer 2/3 barrel cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100, 13638-13643. Ramirez-Villegas, J.F., Logothetis, N.K., and Besserve, M. (2015). Diversity of sharp-wave-ripple LFP signatures reveals differentiated brain-wide dynamical events. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, E6379-E6387. Steinmetz, N.A., Zatka-Haas, P., Carandini, M., and Harris, K.D. (2019). Distributed coding of choice, action and engagement across the mouse brain. Nature 1-8. Vyazovskiy, V. V, Olcese, U., Hanlon, E.C., Nir, Y., Cirelli, C., and Tononi, G. (2011). Local sleep in awake rats. Nature 472, 443-447. Is your SOLIDWORKS pattern slow to rebuild, or worse: just failing outright, with no explanation given? If so, then keep reading, as we introduce the Geometry Pattern checkbox!  The Geometry pattern checkbox in the Pattern property manager On tech support we have seen a few odd situations where the pattern fails without Geometry pattern enabled, but for no apparent reason. And yet, after checking that box, the pattern magically works. Or, the pattern takes excessive (or even ridiculous) time to rebuild, yet with the box checked it rebuilds dramatically faster. The checkbox is unchecked by default. When checked, Geometry pattern attempts to blindly copy the geometry of the pattern seed, rather than evaluating start or end conditions in the pattern instances that were in the seed, such as Offset from Surface. In other words, it minimizes the computing for each instance of the pattern, thus speeding things up. Enabling Geometry pattern is like telling the software, “Don’t think. Just get it done.” However, it does not always succeed. Sometimes you will see an error message that instructs you to de-select that option. BUT when it succeeds, each instance looks exactly the same as the seed, hence the name Geometry Pattern. It can speed up processing time if there are a large number of instances, such as a panel of thousands of holes. Sometimes, for whatever reason, Geometry Pattern is exactly what is needed to make the difference between a failing/slow pattern and a successful/fast one. You might be tempted to quickly extend the solids using a boundary or loft feature between the two, but this usually leads to a fairly poor transition between the bodies. The best way to approach this issue is to actually remove out material and then connect the bodies, using a boundary feature, which very similar to the boundary surface tool. I then create a gusset feature on the bottom of the frame as seen in the pic. Then I want to mirror these 4 gusset features to the top of the frame. I create a Plane that at the frame's midpoint and mirror...The preview of the gussets do go in the right spot and fully touch the top 8020 extrudes...but it wont mirror, instead it says "Geometry pattern results in disjoint bodies". I know, it must mean that the gusset is trying to join to "air" but zooming right in it looks like it's joining in the right spot. (btw: The middle members are not at the halfway point, they are at 9" high, the entire frame is 24" high.) Any ideas why it's coming back disjoint? Thanks, C Similar Threads:
|
