Difference between litigation arbitration and mediation

The Difference Between Mediation, Arbitration, and Litigation

Updated on October 20, 2021

The terms mediation, arbitration and litigation are often casually tossed around as different methods of resolving legal disputes. However, the nuances between these methods of dispute resolutions may not be clear. The following is a brief overview of each method.

Litigation is the most common form of dispute resolution.  In a litigation, the parties bring their claims in a state or federal court to resolve their case through a court trial.  The parties may choose to have a jury trial, where their case is decided by a group of their peers. The alternative is a bench trial, where their case is decided by a judge.  Strict state or federal rules of civil procedure must be adhered in a litigation.  Judgments rendered in a court trial may be appealed to courts of higher jurisdiction.  For example, a federal case is first decided by a District Court judge.  Appeals will be heard by the Circuit Court judges, or the Supreme Court in some specific cases.

Mediation is an alternate dispute resolution method where the parties try to settle their dispute out of court. The parties bring their dispute to a third-party neutral mediator, who is normally a retired judge or an experienced attorney. The mediator listens to both sides of the argument, reviews relevant case law, and analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of each side’s case. The mediator will then address each side individually to point out the strengths and weaknesses of each sides’ case to broker a settlement between the parties. A mediation is non-binding, and the parties are completely free to settle or not settle their case. Everything spoken in a mediation is normally confidential and cannot be used in a court of law as evidence.

Arbitration is another method of alternative dispute resolution. This process is more similar to litigation than mediation. Similar to litigation, the parties’ dispute is resolved through an arbitration hearing, which is like a court trial.  In the arbitration hearing, the parties will present their witnesses and evidence to a neutral arbitrator, who acts in the same capacity as a judge in a court trial. The arbitrator, or arbitrators in some cases, will issue a decision as to the prevailing party in the action. However, unlike litigation, an arbitration may be binding or non-binding, depending on the agreement of the parties. In a binding arbitration, the parties waive their right to a court trial and agree to accept the arbitrator’s decision as the final decision for the matter. Generally, there is no right to an appeal. On the other hand, in a non-binding arbitration, the parties have a right to appeal the arbitration decision and/or request a court trial to relitigate their claims.

For help with obtaining an arbitration, litigation lawyers to prevent a harm and to see if you qualify for a free consultation, contact our real estate attorneys in Los Angeles at (310) 954-1877, [email protected] or by using the contact us box on this page.

Generally, litigation – the process of taking a dispute through the court to a final judgment – is something that any business will want to avoid.It can be as expensive as it is time consuming, and there are often much more efficient ways to resolve your dispute out of court.

That is why alternative dispute resolution, such as arbitration and mediation, is becoming increasingly popular for businesses.

Arbitration is one of the most effective forms of commercial alternative dispute resolution. It is a formal, legally binding process where the dispute is resolved by the decision of a nominated third party, known as the arbitrator.

Being a private process, confidentiality is one of the key features that draws many private and public sector organisations to use arbitration. Disputes can also be resolved much faster than in standard litigation, and at a much lower expense.

If the relevant contract does not contain a clause that obliges the parties to arbitrate instead of approaching the courts to resolve any disputes that arise, a party to a dispute can still request arbitration by sending a written demand to the other. If the opposition believes that the dispute can be resolved through arbitration, proceedings can begin immediately.

Parties can select their arbitrator, too. This is particularly beneficial in a complex or specialist case, where specialist skills may be useful in deciding a fair outcome for both parties.

Many of the world’s largest companies have chosen to arbitrate and to keep their dispute out of the public eye.One of the few arbitrations that did become public knowledge was a contract dispute between the car manufacturers Volkswagen and Suzuki in 2011.

Mediation is a voluntary, non-binding method of resolving disputes using an impartial third party, who has been specially trained to bring two parties together to reach agreement.

Mediation is a widely recognised form of dispute resolution in commercial matters and its use is still increasing.

Although mediation is not legally binding, a final agreement between the two parties, reached at mediation, can be enforced as a contract.

Whilst arbitration is an alternative to the litigation process, mediation can be used as part of that process. And matters that are in arbitration can be mediated too! In the Dispute Resolution team at Longmores, we encourage clients who are involved in court litigation or in arbitration proceedings to mediate the dispute. It can often resolve matters quicker and save the cost of a lengthy battle.Resolution by mediation is also far less damaging to any long term relationship between the parties, so it is an especially attractive option if that is a factor.

For advice on litigation, arbitration, or mediation issues, contact John Wiblin, Head of our Dispute Resolution.

Please note the contents of this blog are given for information only and must not be relied upon. Legal advice should always be sought in relation to specific circumstances.

What is the main difference between mediation and arbitration?

Thus, in arbitration, the private judge is in control of the process and the outcome, whereas in mediation, the disputing parties maintain control. Most Arbitrators will be flexible and work around the schedules and needs of the parties.

What are the 4 types of disputes?

Family Disputes..
Commercial Disputes..
Industrial Disputes..
Property Disputes..

What are the five methods of dispute resolution?

Dispute resolution methods.
arbitration..
mediation..
conciliation..
case appraisal..

What is the difference between mediation and conciliation?

Mediation is a more informal process than conciliation. Unlike a conciliation commission, the mediator does not have the authority to issue formal orders or decisions.