The Ratification DebateRatifying the ConstitutionOnce the Constitution of the United States was written in 1787 at the Philadelphia convention, the next step was ratification. This is the formal process, outlined in Article VII, which required that nine of the thirteen states had to agree to adopt the Constitution before it could go into effect. Show
As in any debate there were two sides, the Federalists who supported ratification and the Anti-Federalists who did not. We now know that the Federalists prevailed, and the U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1788, and went into effect in 1789. Read about their arguments below.
The CourtsHow did the Anti-Federalists feel about the federal courts?Similar to how they felt about the rest of the proposed federal government, the Anti-Federalists believed the Constitution granted too much power to the federal courts, at the expense of the state and local courts. They argued that the federal courts would be too far away to provide justice to the average citizen. How did the Federalists feel about the federal courts?The Federalists argued that the federal courts had limited jurisdiction, leaving many areas of the law to the state and local courts. The Federalists felt that the new federal courts were necessary to provide checks and balances on the power of the other two branches of government. They believed the federal courts would protect citizens from government abuse, and guarantee their liberty. Courts todayFederalism is a form of government in which power is divided between the national government and the state governments. In the United States, there is a federal court system. In addition, each state has its own courts. To learn more about this dual court system, visit the Student Center page State Courts vs. Federal Courts.  The Ratification DebateDirections: Click START to begin the Student Challenge. Identify each of the following statements as describing the FEDERALIST or the ANTI-FEDERALIST point of view. Use the ARROW to move through the questions. Check your RESULTS at the end. Congratulations - you have completed The Ratification Debate. You scored %%SCORE%% out of
%%TOTAL%%. Your performance has been rated as %%RATING%% Your answers are highlighted below. Shaded items are complete.
Why did some Federalists oppose adding a bill of rights to the Constitution?The Federalists opposed including a bill of rights on the ground that it was unnecessary. The Anti-Federalists, who were afraid of a strong centralized government, refused to support the Constitution without one.
What is the name of the process by which most protections found in the Bill of Rights have been made applicable to the states?The incorporation doctrine is a constitutional doctrine through which the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution (known as the Bill of Rights) are made applicable to the states through the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Incorporation applies both substantively and procedurally.
What was the main reason why Alexander Hamilton opposed a bill of rights quizlet?What was the main reason that Alexander Hamilton did not want a bill of rights? He believed it was unnecessary for a government that possessed only specifically delegated powers. the Antifederalists demanded it as the price of ratification of the Constitution.
Why did AntiWhy did the Anti-Federalists want to include a bill of rights in the Constitution? Anti-Federalists were also concerned that the Constitution lacked a specific listing of rights. They believed that a bill of rights was essential to protect the people from the federal government.
|
