What is the reason of justification for why the study is being conducted?

The justification of the investigation refers to the basis of the investigation or the reason why the investigation is being carried out. The justification should include an explanation for the design used and the methods used in the research.

The justification for the project is to try to explain why a solution to the problem described in the research needs to be implemented. The rationale must be correctly addressed so that the entire research project can be strong.

What is the reason of justification for why the study is being conducted?

In an investigation one must justify virtually everything that is done. Each aspect of the study design has an influence on what is learned from the study.

Critics may detract from the findings if they believe that there is something atypical about the people who were selected for the study, some bias that makes certain people selected, something unfair about the groups compared, something bad about the approach of the questions, etc.

Therefore, you need to provide a reason for home aspect of the study. To see how a foundation makes a difference, one must imagine that two different studies are being read with similar designs and methods but with different reasons. Then one should ask what is considered most persuasive; that will have the best justification.

How to Write a Research Rationale

1- State the statement

A good narrative of justification must begin with a brief summary of what one wants to declare, which will be the focus of the piece.

The statement should state what changes are believed to be imposed, what budget is needed, what policies should be implemented, the problem at hand, etc.

It should be a simple statement, for example: you want to do a study on the cultivation of peaches in this locality.

2- Establish reasons

Once the statement has been made, the reasoning should begin. For example, if you want to do research on the cultivation of peaches in a village, you should give details of why this topic is important.

In this case, it could be said that peaches are of great economic importance for this locality.

It is important to frame the argument with the audience in mind. So in this case one should not only talk about the fact that peaches are important, one should talk about how this study would help increase the GDP of the community, the creation of jobs, etc.

3- Provide support

An argument can be made to strengthen the investigation, but if one does not have support for these arguments the reader will not be able to convince himself that it speaks the truth.

Any support should be provided in the form of statistics, studies and expert opinions.

For example, if you want to study peaches, you can include figures and studies on the impact of peaches on local economy and jobs.

As far as possible, serious studies should be found to support the argument. As long as more support is offered, the justification will be stronger.

4- Discuss budget problems

The research budget should be an important part of the justification. Relevant information on the budget should be included, including the resources needed to conduct the research and the impact it will have; the possible revenues that will be generated or what costs will be saved.

In the case of the study of peaches could be mentioned the budget necessary to carry out the research and the possible positive economic impacts on the locality that the study would have.

Difference between good and bad justification narratives

All aspects of a good project justification must be based on logical reasoning or foundation.

To see how good reasoning makes the difference, one could imagine that two studies are being read with similar designs and methods but with different foundations.

The most logical, partial and professional narrative will be the most appropriate. In the following cases it can be observed:

Research question

Example of bad justification: I was curious.

Example of good justification: a discrepancy was noticed in the investigation and it was wanted to put to the test.

Sample

Example of bad justification: I know these teachers.

Example of good justification: these teachers represent the population that other researchers have been studying.

Comparison

Example of bad justification: we did not bother comparing them with other people because we knew they were honest people.

An example of good justification: they were compared to another group that was similar to them in all respects, except in their knowledge of this subject of particular interest.

Information Collection

Example of bad justification: it was easier to do it this way and / or had no time to do anything else.

Example of good justification: the information we collected was directly relevant to the discrepancy we wanted to know a little more.

Interpretation

Example of bad justification: the patterns we observe make sense and support my personal experiences.

Example of good justification: the patterns we observed were consistent with one version of this theory and not with the other. Therefore, questions arise about the second version of this theory.

Example of a justification for the investigation

POPPY study on the HIV epidemic in the UK and Ireland

Several reports have suggested that age-related co-morbidity occurs earlier in HIV-infected subjects on effective antiretroviral therapy compared to HIV-negative subjects.

However, control populations within these studies are not always closely matched to HIV-infected populations and therefore such findings need to be interpreted with caution.

POPPY attempts to recruit HIV-infected individuals of different age groups and a good equivalence of unaffected HIV control population to be able to determine the effects that HIV infection has on other medical conditions.

Across the United Kingdom, those of black or white African descent, and those who acquired HIV through sexual intercourse account for 84% of older people receiving HIV treatment in 2009 (A. Brown, personal communication) .

Clinics participating in the POPPY study have provided care for

Of the patients who received treatment at these clinics in 2008-2009, 12,1620 fell into one of these groups, of which about 19% were> 50 on their most recent visit.