Công ty TNHH Thương Mại và Dịch Vụ Kỹ Thuật DIỆU PHÚC - GPĐKKD: 0316172372 cấp tại Sở KH & ĐT TP. HCM. Địa chỉ văn phòng: 350-352 Võ Văn Kiệt, Phường Cô Giang, Quận 1, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Việt Nam. Điện thoại: 028.7108.9666. Show  Công ty TNHH Thương Mại và Dịch Vụ Kỹ Thuật DIỆU PHÚC - GPĐKKD: 0316172372 cấp tại Sở KH & ĐT TP. HCM. Địa chỉ văn phòng: 350-352 Võ Văn Kiệt, Phường Cô Giang, Quận 1, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Việt Nam. Điện thoại: 028.7108.9666. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores51296CUDA cores512no dataCore clock speed1020 MHz700 MHzBoost clock speed1085 MHzno dataNumber of transistors1,870 million585 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm40 nmPower consumption (TDP)55 Watt49 WattMaximum GPU temperature95 °Cno dataTexture fill rate34.7211.2 GT/sFloating-point performance1,111 gflops268.8 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no dataInterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16Length5.7" (14.5 cm)145 mmHeight4.376" (11.1 cm)no dataWidth2-slot1-slotSupplementary power connectorsNoneNone MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5DDR3Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GBMemory bus width128 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed5.0 GB/s1800 MHzMemory bandwidth80 GB/s25.6 GB/s Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAMulti monitor support3 displaysno dataHDMI++HDCP+no dataMaximum VGA resolution2048x1536no dataAudio input for HDMIInternalno data TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. Blu Ray 3D+no data3D Gaming+no data3D Vision+no data3D Vision Live+no data API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)Shader Model5.15.1OpenGL4.44.6OpenCL1.21.1Vulkan1.1.126N/ACUDA+2.1 Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. GTX 750 outperforms GT 730 by 305% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% GTX 750 outperforms GT 730 by 305% in Passmark. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% GTX 750 outperforms GT 730 by 239% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% GTX 750 outperforms GT 730 by 227% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. GeekBench 5 VulkanGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% GTX 750 outperforms GT 730 by 166% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan. GeekBench 5 CUDAGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 4% GTX 750 outperforms GT 730 by 290% in GeekBench 5 CUDA. Octane Render OctaneBenchThis is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists. Benchmark coverage: 4% GTX 750 outperforms GT 730 by 180% in Octane Render OctaneBench. Mining hashratesCryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 750 and GeForce GT 730. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 143 Mh/s 35 Mh/s Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) no data 1 Mh/s Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 8.66 2.14 Recency 18 February 2014 18 June 2014 Cost $119 $59.99 Pipelines / CUDA cores 512 96 Memory bandwidth 80 25.6 Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 49 Watt The GeForce GTX 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 730 in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 750 GeForce GT 730 Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
